is in nieuwe DSM-V gediagnostiseerd, maar als ze met de oude was gediagnostiseerd was het waarschijnlijk PDD-NOS geworden
officieel alleen vermoeden, zoveel hulp/therapie gehad dat het niet meer duidelijk is
Autisme, misschien Asperger ivm intelligentie

CVS (chronisch vermoeidheidssyndroom) en EVA-syndroom (binnenoor)

vroeger epileptische aanval. Hormonaal rond 11 jaar oud, daarna op 12.5 jaar gestopt.

Methylpehnidaat, 25 mg (15 + 10 mg), niet altijd, niet weekend
since half december halve paroxetine per dag

niet officieel, heeft wat meer tijd nodig voor leesdingen

Hele WISC afgenomen door Karakter95% confidence: 98-113Dysharmonic: verbal 114 (105-121), performance 95 (86-106)
dysharmonisch: verbaal 136, performaal 117
Papieren versie opgeslagen in archief 3018026.01
Normscores:OT: 11. OV: 9. BP: 13. WK: 12.
Volledige WISC afgenomen bij KarakterIQ gebaseerd op volledige WISC: TIQ 97, VIQ 99, PIQ 95Normscores OT 8, BP 9, WK 7, OV 9
moeder geinteresseerd in uitslag- mailen
VIQ: 124, PIQ: 107, T: 119Result sent to parents by email, as they were interested
WISC afgenomen bij KarakterIQ gebaseerd op volledige WISC: TIQ 111, VIQ 103, PIQ 118Normscores: OT 9, BP 13, WK 9, OV 12
Norm OT: 10Norm BP: 5Norm WK: 14Norm: OV: 15PIQ: 85VIQ: 107TIQ: 96
Ouders interesse in uitslag, mailen.PIQ 99, VIQ 99, TIQ 99
OV 7, WK 7, OT 10, BP 12TIQ 92, VIQ 88, PIQ 99
OV 6, WS 9, BP 12VIQ 96, PIQ 106, TIQ 97
Moeder heeft interesse in uitslag: opsturen.Normscores:OT: 10. Bp: 12. OV: 11. WK: 12.VIQ 108. PIQ 106. TIQ 107.
Moeder interesse in uitslag. Opsturen.NormscoresOT: 13. BP: 15. OV: 15. WK: 16.
Ouders geinteresseerd naar uitslag. Verzonden 31-10-2018
OT 10, BP 5, OV 8, WK 8PIQ 85 VIQ 89TIQ 87
Totaal IQ = 99-112Verbaal begrip = 113 [verbaal]Visueel ruimtelijk = 100 [performaal]
OT 8, BP 2, WK 7, OV 9.PIQ: 70- VIQ: 89- TIQ: 80EXCLUSIE
OT 7, BP, 13, WK 8, OV 10PIQ: 100, VIQ 95, TIQ 97 (according to Excel sheet)
moeder geintereseerd in uitslag: mailenOT 11, BP 16, OV 16, WK 8PIQ: 130, VIQ: 112, TIQ: 123
Mentions he goes to a bilingual school so sometimes struggles to think of the Dutch word.
deelnemer geïnteresseerd in uitslag: mailen
WAIS score GGZ aanvragen.Normscores:OV 17, WK 18, BP, 12, OT niet afgenomenVIQ: 138, PIQ: 114TIQ: 131
Norm scores: OV 9, BP 6, WK 9VIQ: 95- PIQ: 89- TIQ: 92

Screen in cubicle did not work prior to first practice. Technical support fixed it. Problem: COM3 and HDMI cables were left in the tower. Removing these fixed the issue.
TAE main was restarted after block 2 due to having to re-instruct the participant. Conflicting/double files were renamed as follows: old blocks, to be discarded, marked as "discard" in the file name. New blocks "_1" suffix removed from file name.
Keyboard does not work at start of practice TAE. Restarting computer fixes this.
Live cam not working, so online monitoring not possible.
Monitor of the old TV doesn't work, cannot check up on participant during the task. During the TAE main task, I started the SD main task. Noticed after one block and switched to TAE task. However, MatLab crashed and I couldn't write down the missing info for the TAE practice task in Castor (Left and Right responses)
When first attempting to run the tae practice script (the very first scrip), there was this error:Error using ScreenUsage:oldTextSize=Screen('TextSize', windowPtr [,textSize])-Error in DrawFormattedText (line 220)theight = Screen('TextSize', win) * vSpacing-Error in fullscreenloop (line 15) DrawFormattedText(Gparams.pWindow, text, 'center', 'center', 255)-Error in tae_practice (line 20)fullscreenloop(Gparams)- % ensures that window is fullscreenError in run (line 96)evalin('caller', [script '-'])-Rerunning the script solved the issue.

Vond het saai, maar doet goed haar best. Geen missed responses. Tae: gebruikt adaptor actief in strategie om orientatie target te bepalen.Sd: (na practice) vindt het lastig, heeft het idee dat het niet goed gaat, maar heeft prima score (38/41).Gaat op een bepaald moment uit de steun.
Much interest in how the experiment works, the equipment, the keyboard, the scripts/programming language, what the score is based on, etc.Sometimes difficulty sitting still.Sd practice: wants door closed.Towards end more impatient/figety.
More movement over time but stayed in position
wanted to do it without glasses first, eventually chose to keep them on
TAE blok 1: says he missed one response but he still had perfect score, how can that be? answer: you don't get scored on the most difficult items.We agree that he can choose to skip some breaks if he wants to continue.SD does practice well, a bit lower performance during real blocks
Heeft decision bias naar rechts, vooral sd practice block.Is na tae blok 1 al geintereseerd in waar we naar kijken. Ik zeg dat ik dit achteraf zal uitleggen.Zegt na sd practice blok: stuk lastiger!
Ziet soms vlekken/lijnen --> after-effect van luminance van het scherm. Kijkt dan snel even weg om het te herstellen.Heeft geen behoefte aan veel pauzes, dus ik laat hem zelf kiezen of hij door wil.
Heeft geen eten mee dus krijgt vooraf een brownie van de experimenter.Steeds hoge scores bij tae. Volgt instructies goed op. Wrijft na tae blok 3 in ogen, gaat daarna door.Eet na tae nog een stroopwafel.SD alles duidelijk, goede score oefenen. Mag tijdens echte taak zelf kiezen hoe lang ze de pauzes neemt.Zeer goede score na sd blok 1. Wrijft weer ogen.
Asks questions during instruction (e.g. about immediate feedback), seems motivated to understand it well.Indicates that the low light in the room in combination with the light of the computer screen may cause her a headache- instructed to tell us if that happens and we will adjust the lighting in the room.After tae practice block we turn the light up 1 level due to her eyes watering (perhaps due to lenses?).She asks if, if she presses so quickly that the arrows don't disappear, this means she has to press again. I confirm that she indeed would have to check again.After tae block 2 longer break, chat with experimenter.
tae practice block 1 maar 9 van 16 correct, practice block 2 all 16 correct
Tae na blok 2, meldt: stipje beweegt! (is niet zo)Raakt in tae blok 4 concentratie kwijt, gaat even uit kinrust, nek strekkenSd practice gaat iets minder, 34 van 41Kan tijdens sd minder goed concentreren
Heeft bij oefenen tae en in begin tae beetje last van ogen door licht van het scherm. Later niet meer.Zit heel goed stil.Zegt dat het soms lastig is als de boven- en onderkant van de stimulus andere richtingen hebben.
Has gaming experience, which he thinks will help him respond accurately and fast.Tae practice only 12 of 16 correct. Maybe was sometimes judging not around the vertical but around the horizontal, he theorizes.After block 1: notes how quiet it is in the room. Can hear himself think, which is helpful. Is imagining Mozart's Requiem which helps him do better at the task, he feels. He's right, he got full score now.Sd practice: remarks that sometimes the stimulus has a curve, which makes both answers possibly correct (I know, it's on purpose!)Sd block 2: tells me afterwards he was distracted for a while because one pattern reminded him of a bee, which reminded him again of a story on his roleplay server. His score was fine, though (79/81) so I'm not so worried about him getting distracted.
Heeft na tae block 2 een beetje last van traanogen. Later niet meer.Responses bij oefenblokken heel gelijkmatig.Gaat bij sd blok 1 wel even uit kinrust.
Mag zelf kiezen of hij na elk blok pauze wil of na elke 2 blokken: kiest voor 2de,Beweegt veel met handen, maar concentreert zich welVindt tweede taak lastig, practice scores goed, daarna minder
Long break during tae and sd.Learns instructions well, leans fast. Understands tasks well.Sd performance lower, even below chance on block 1. Seems to have difficulty with lower performance on sd task.
After SD practice: can decide herself whether she wants to take a break or continue.
Performs worse during sd task. Seems to be getting tired/uninterested. Sometimes leaves head rest for a moment, but never long.
Asks many questions during instructions. Seems to struggle with left/right, so we use "this side" and " that side".TAE: sits still quite well, high scores, doesn't seem to want long breaks. Toilet break after block 3.SD: last 2 blocks we could no longer make use of the headrest. His performance is going down, so after 2nd block we take a longer break and get hot choco.
Chooses herself how long of breaks to take. Stays in head rest quite well. Scores high both on TAE and SD. Indicates after second SD block that she is getting tired, but performance stays fine.
TAE: rather mobile, not always in headrest, but performance gets better over time. Gets to choose how long he wants to have his breaks and when he wants to continue.SD: gets instruction very quickly, wants to move on.
Tae: is redelijk bewegelijk, gaat soms uit kinsteun. Maar performance is wel prima. Sd: oefenen prima, de blokken matige performance.
Use of other headrest.Tae block 2 lower performance? But improves again after that.Sd practice 29 out of 41, but said she got a hang of the task over the course of the practice, so is allowed to continue.
Gets to choose herself how long her breaks are, chooses short breaks. Sits quite still except for light swaying and leg movement, can focus well. TAE high performance, SD well but slight decrease over time.
Performs well on tae, decent and consistent on sd. Has no complaints about the tasks. Follows instructions (e.g. recommendation to roll shoulders during the break).
Scoort bij tae oefenblok 1 slecht: 6 uit 16 goed. Instructies verduidelijkt, nog een oefenblok gestart. Nu beter: 12 van 16 goed. Neemt het nu anders waar, zegt hij- "gebruikt riet". Na tae blok 2 pauze. Zegt dat ene patroon duidelijker is dan andere. Gaat ook even naar wc.Na blok 3 hoogste score tot nu toe: 28 van 32.Zit goed stil. Volgt instructies voor shouders rollen en strekken in pauzes goed op.Is erg benieuwd naar waar wij nou eigenlijk naar kijken, maar dit kan ik pas achteraf uitleggen.Sd practice prima (36 van 41).
Tae practice goede score (30 van 32)Na tae blok 1 en 2 volledige score, is er blij mee.Zegt dat ze het wel leuk vindt om mee te doen aan dit soort dingen.Sd practice gaat weer erg goed, heeft 39 van 41 goed.Na sd blok 1 strekt zich, loopt rondje.Gaat steeds meer gapen.
Behavioral screening: mentions he has some claustrophobia, but not enough to be a problem in this size of cubicle. We test first if the door can be closed - it can.SD practice full score.
After tae block 1: indicates he prefers shorter breaks. He is instructed that he can be independent and choose his break length himself, but is requested to stretch during the breaks. He does so well.The same rules apply during the sd task.
Na tae oefenblok: vertelt dat hij soms last krijgt van zijn ogen, due to contrast light screen and dim periphery. We will check whether we need to adjust the lighting. Also tells me he may not be very comfortable with the doors closed, so we may leave those open.After tae block 1 we briefly visit his family in the other room. We turn the light in the cubicle up 1 setting- the doors can remain closed. Seems to need longer breaks than most.After task he mentions aftereffect of light screen. We turn the light up one more brightness setting to prevent this.We visit family again during break between tae and sd.Decent score sd practice. Bias towards right - instructed to spread responses more.Seems to become more impatient towards the end, but scores remain good. Takes head out of headrest more.
Tae practice 26 correct (below average), but good enough to continue. Response bias towards the right- receives instruction that it is more even. For tae main, chooses to decide on his own breaks- only after block 2 I will come in for sure.Tae scores fluctuate, remain mediocre (around 24-26 of 32) but not worryingly so. Sits still well.During sd instruction, struggles slightly with direction of arrows.After tae block 2, mentions he has dry eyes.
Evening session.Performs well on tae blocks (full score for all 4 blocks of the main task). Only takes longer break after block 2, so halfway. In this break, mentions her eyes start to react to staring at the screen. After tae, when already having left cubicle: mentions she is seeing after-effects of lines.SD task good scores. Does not come across as tired or bored.
Unusually mobile, moves a lot during session, adjusting chin rest, chair, stretching, etc also outside of breaks.Tae: can decide on length breaks himself, is asked to come out after block 2 to stretch his legs.Tae block 4 misses more responses due to loss of attention.Frequently leaves headrest.
During tae_practice, complains about sore eyes- we turn up the light (to 2). Seems motivated to perform well, doesn't seem to want to chat much in between.SD instruction: picks up very fast.
tae_practice: picks up task quicklytae_main: performs well. full score on 2 of the 4 blocks. I only check in after block 2- the other times the participant is instructed that they can continue themselves. From block 3 onwards the participant leaves the chinrest sometimes, head higher or lower, but still close to the correct distance. Misses a few trials, but not consistently.sd_practice: understands instructions well, performs very well (38 of 41). Remarks that the gratings are harder than the button mapping.sd_main: does not stay in chinrest but leans back / pulls head back slightly.
Tae practice block 1: 16/32- was comparing test stimulus to inducer instead of to the vertical- clarified instructions, then block 2 32/32.Doors stay open because of sound preferences.Good performance tae.Good performance sd practice. Turn light up (to 2) to prevent painful eyes.After sd block 1: still bothered by eyes
During tae instruction: seems a bit unsure about how to tell if it's to the left or to the right. But performs well during tae practice. For tae block 1 we try with door closed, which goes well. Block 2 through 4 she can decide for herself what to do during the breaks.
After tae practice block 1 score is 0 of 16 correct?? Started another practice block. Now 2 of 16 correct. Checked instructions with her- she seems to understand fine. Started main task. Scores do not improve. I get the impression she has reversed the buttons. Checked this theory about tae main block 2, and appears to be correct. Restarted task to try again. Now scores are great (30/32). Apologized for confusion and for having her redo 2 blocks. She stretches in between blocks. After main block 3 her hands starts to hurt a bit.NB: has done 2 extra tae blocks due to restart.
tae_practice: not a great score (10/16), but seems to understand the task well, so is allowed to continue with the main blocks.tae_main: Sits very still. 30/32 after block 1, great improvement. Is asked if he wants me to check in every 5 minutes or if he would like to choose for himself. Chooses the second option- is instructed to please still stretch during breaks. Follows that instruction after block 2 and onwards. Performance steadily decreases over time (+/- 26, 24, 18). After block 3, rubs face and jaw.sd_practice: understands already, before explicit instruction, what the different button mapping screens mean. Decent performance on practice block.sd_main: reasonably good performance on block 1, 2,
Understands instructions well, but says he finds left/right difference difficult to see.Tae practice: 24/32. quite a few missed responses, esp. towards end of the task. Turns out he just presses the button so fast it doesn't register. Is instructed that if the arrows on the screen don't disappear, he should press again.We agree I will only come in after block 2- apart from that he can plan his own breaks.Tae_main: block 1 32/32 score, dabs to himself. Stretches, then continues. Block 2 also 32/32, says he was unsure about 5 or 10, I tell him guessing often works. Block 3 30/32, continues after about 10 seconds. Block 4 32/32.SD instruction: picks up very fast.sd_practice: great performance, 37/41.sd_main: block 1 continues good performance, 77/81. Briefly checks phone. Block 2 76/81. Checks phone in break again. Good performance on last block also.Throughout session, has head hoovering above chin rest or slightly pulled back.
Tae practice block 1 has difficulty, so start another block. Presses Windows key halfway into the block causing a menu pop-up, but the task still works, just with the task bar in the bottom. Seems restless, moving his left hand. Practice block 2 performance much better (26/32), can continue. Asks clarification of left/right zebras so I draw examples for him, which helps.Tae main: block 1 performance great (30/32), says he is still not sure about the left/right thing but this clearly does not impact performance. Block 2 worse (24/32), seems restless, complains about how long we have already been doing this. Block 3 poor (12/32), block 4 great (28/32).Motivation seems low so is asked if he wants to do the second task. He says he does.Understands instructions pretty well.SD practice block 1: 31/41, sometimes presses very quickly so he could not have seen which button he needs, is instructed to take a little bit more time in those cases.SD main block 1, 2, 3: performance low, ~50/81. Pulls on headrest a lot and adjusts height. Afterwards shows that it is possible to just hold a key down for long periods of time and submitting answers this way. Raises the question whether he did this during the task, instead of actually answering.
Tae instruction: picks up task very quickly. Tae practice: performs well, 26/32. Seems fine with continuing.Tae main block 1: again good performance, sits reasonably still, stretches a bit in break then is fine to continue. Asks if there are 2 or 3 blocks left. Block 2 performance great (30/32), seems not too interested in chatting with me, checks his phone for a second, then continues. Block 3 performance still good (26/32), spends a minute afterwards texting. Longer break, then continue.SD instruction picks up quite quickly.SD practice block: good performance, 34/41.SD blocks: good performance, sometimes moves a lot and moves out of headrest, but not problematically so.
Picks up instruction very well.The screen in the cubicle did not receive signal- spent about 5 minutes figuring out the correct setting. then fixed.Tae practice: performs reasonably well, 24/36. No questions, can continue. Is instructed that she can pick her own breaks, with the exception of after block 2.Tae main: block 1 good, 28/32, stretches as instructed, then continues.Block 2, 30/32. Takes a few minutes break. Block 3 very good, 32/32. Block 4 again 32/32.Sd instruction: picks up quickly again.SD practice: Good. 38/41SD main: Task goes well. 70/81, even 78/81 on the last block.Takes short breaks inbetween blocks.
Instructions: She understood the task well after Ella explained the correct version. Shy.Tae Practice: practice went well, 26/32.Tae real task: good performance, full score on 2/4 blocks. Moves a bit during some blocks, moves head backwards slightly- stretches during blocks as instructed. After task reports she feels tired.SD instruction: picks up well.SD practice: good performance, 38/41.SD main: performs reasonably well, has trouble sitting still, quite mobile.
Tae instruction: participant understands instructions well.Tae practice: practice trials went well, 30/32, no questions. Tae: participant decides himself when to take a break., is instructed to stretch a bit during breaks to prevent fatigue. Webcam monitoring doesn't work, we can't monitor participant movement. Performance overall good, block 1 (32/32), block 2 (32/32). Break, tried to fix monitoring webcam, failed, chat with participant, all okay. Start block 3 (32/32), block 4 (32/32). Seems like he takes breaks with some time to recover, complying with instructions. Longer break, webcam monitoring is fixed, plug was not in outlet. Participant goes to bathroom.SD instruction: participant understands instructions well.SD practice: medium performance (33/41), may continue.SD: Participant can choose length breaks himself. Webcam monitoring works. Participant sits quite still. Block 1 (71/81), stretches during break. Block 2 (68/81), stretches in break. Block 2 (73/81).
TAE instruction: all clear.TAE practice: perfect score (32/32), no questions.TAE main: instructed to stretch during breaks. I'll only come in after block 2. Block 1 (30/32), stretches. Block 2 (30/32), I go in for a brief chat. Block 3 (30/32). Block 4 (32/32). SD instruction all clear.SD practice goes well (37/41). Says sometimes she needs a moment to think but everything is clear.SD main: I will not come in during the breaks- she is instructed to stretch. Block 1 good performance (77/81). Stretches in break, checks phone, rubs shoulder. Block 2 (73/81). Rubs (under) eyes, yawns & stretches. Checks phone. Block 3 keeps phone out and open but doesn't look down on it - music? Puts it away after ~20 trials. Block 3 (68/81) - maybe slightly lower concentration.
tae practice: Participant understand the instructions well. Practice went well (30/32). Sits quite still and is calm. tae main: Participant is instructed to take breaks a her own pace. Sits still during task. Block 1 average performance (18/32). Comes outside to ask if she should continue or take a break, decides to continue. She tells us that the task is clear, but that she thinks it doesn't go very well. Block 2 (14/32). Ella intervenes, apparently she thought that she had to judge the grating orientation in respect to the first pattern, instead of to the vertical plane. Everything is clear now, restart of the task. Block 1 (32/32) Excellent performance. Block 2 (30/32). Experimenter walks in and asks how everything is going, all okay. Block 3 (32/32). Block 4 (30/32).sd practice: Practice went well, 36/41. Everything clear.sd main: Participant decides breaks herself. All still okay. Sits quite still. Block 1 (72/81). Doesn't stretch in between blocks. Block 2 (72/81). Directly continues after block. Block 3 (74/81).
Before: does she need her glasses? No, she can see without, only needed for long periods (>2 hours).TAE instruction: all clear.TAE practice: great performance, 32/32, no questions.TAE main: block 1 great performance (32/32), check in, asked to stretch for a bit, then can continue. Block 2 good performance (30/32), admits task is quite boring. Eats a cookie, then continues. Block 3 (30/32), quick break. Mum asks if she notices differences in difficulty between the blocks. Participant says no (and is confirmed in this being true). Block 4 good again (30/32).SD instruction: gets button mapping right away before instruction. SD practice: medium performance (33/41), everything clear nevertheless, is allowed to continue.SD main: block 1 good performance (72/81), asks why it's 81 now and not 41, gets explanation. Block 2 & block 3 medium performance. Mum asks afterwards if it wasn't too boring, participant denies, says it was fine.Overall comments: follows instructions well, keeps head still in correct position, does move hand regularly, makes faces (and maybe sounds?) but nothing that should interfere with her ability to do the task. Spins chair 360 deg once before starting each block.
TAE instruction: Asks if zebra is shorter on the screen than the reed: answer yes. All clear.TAE practice: asks if head should be on chinrest. Answer yes. Perfect performance, 32/32.TAE main: Is instructed to stretch in break. I will only come in after block 2, for the rest he can decide how long to take his breaks. Block 1 great performance again, 32/32, stretches a while, then continues. Block 2 again 32/32, takes a longer break, we chat a bit, he gets something to drink. Complains about watery eyes, so I turn up the light in the room slightly (from 3 to 2). Block 3 (32/32), very brief break, then continues. Block 4 (32/32).SD instruction: all clear.SD practice: only misses first zebra because he is a little too slow. Incredible performance, 41/41. Says it didn't feel like that. I explain he isn't scored on the most difficult zebras, and that if we play on intuition, this usually goes well. SD main: Is instructed he can take breaks as long as he wants, and to stretch during these breaks. Block 1 good performance again (74/81). Block 2 (76/81). Stretches, look at camera, glances at his phone, then continues. Block 3 (72/81).
Pp is quite tired, just finished exams.TAE instruction: all clear.TAE practice: great performance, 32/32. Pp checks if she has to indicate the direction of the zebra compared to the vertical axis (which she thinks), or compared to the preceding stimulus. She's correct that it's compared to the vertical axis. Restart Matlab because the computer was not on the correct setting. Now is on Testing setting (Network enabled). TAE main: block 1 great performance (32/32), says she is surprised cause she thinks she got 3 wrong, so I explain we do not score all items. Ask if her eyes are still okay, she says she'll be fine. Block 2 great again (32/32), comes out briefly, notices video monitoring and is explained reason for it. Then continues. Block 3 again great (32/32), yawns, brief break, then continues. Block 4 (32/32). Yawns.Only brief break because she wants to continue.SD instruction: picks it up super fast.SD practice: good performance (37/41). Explains how she reconsidered a few of her answers after already pressing the button.SD main: block 1 good performance (77/81), I explain why it's out of 81 now instead of 41. Block 2 blinks a lot, seems quite tired, consistent performance (77/81). Block 3 (75/81).
TAE instruction: all clear.TAE practice: excellent performance (32/32). All clear. Instruction for breaks: I'll come in every time, but he can decide how long to take breaks.TAE main: block 1 (32/32), I instruct to stretch, then he continues. Block 2 (32/32). Block 3 (32/32). Block 4 (32/32).Generally took short breaks. SD instruction: all clear, catches on very fast.SD practice: great performance: 37/41. Same break procedure. SD main: block 1 great (76/81). Block 2 (70/81). Deep sigh.. Block 3 starts missing some responses, but seems fine still (72/81).
Instruction: by Amy, all clear.TAE practice: Mediocre performance (24/32), but all seems clear, so we continue anyway.TAE main: block 1 good performance (28/32). Stretches, then continues. Block 2: great performance (32/32). Comes outside for a moment, talks about how the light contrast bugs her eyes a bit, so we turn up the light (3 --> 2). Block 3: 26/32. Block 4: 32/32.SD instruction: Amy instruction, participant understands the task well.SD practice: Practice is good (36/41). Participant can choose her own breaks.SD main: Block 1 (71/81), Block 2: 76/81. Block 3: 78/81.
TAE instruction: all clear.TAE practice: perfect score (32/32), all clear.TAE main: is instructed that I will only come in after block 2. Please roll shoulders/stretch during breaks to prevent fatigue. Block 1 (30/32). Continues right away. Block 2 (32/32). Gets some water in the break, quick chat. Mentions his concentration fades sometimes. Block 3 (?/32), block 4 (32/32).SD instruction: picks it up quickly, all clear.SD practice: great performance (40/41), seems to want to quickly continue.SD main: block 1 (75/81)., stretches a bit., then continues. Block 2 amazing score (79/81), stretches again. Block 3 (72/81).
TAE instruction: all clear.TAE practice: went well, 28/32. No questions. Is instructed I will only come in after block 2.TAE main: block 1 poor performance (18/32). Stretches, is allowed to continue. Block 2 very poor performance (2/32), is asked what could be going wrong, tells me she is using a different strategy now where she imagines the zebra - clearly that is not working, instructing to go back to her old method. Restarted main task. TAE main restart: block 1 (0/32). Turns out she was reversing left and right. Corrected, try again.TAE main restart 2: block (32/32), experimenter comes in briefly to confirm we can continue. Block 2 (30/32), stretches. Block 3 (32/32), gets up, walks, stretches. Block 4 (32/32).Long break.SD instruction: all seems clear, rehearses button mapping for a bit to herself.SD practice: great score (41/41), all clear. Is explained why score is 41 if she missed 1: only graded on half the items. SD main: block 1 (79/81), gets up, stretches. Block 2 (79/81), idem dito. Block 3 (78/81).
Tae explanation: Participant was a bit confused whether he should respond in relation to the first gabor or to the midline, explained before starting the task.tae practice: participant is very calm and understands the task. bias to the left (?). Performance excellent 32/32. tae main: Participant can choose breaks himself, will check u p on him after second block. Participants seems very focused and calm. Sits still. Block 1: excellent (32/32). Block 2: 32/32. After the second block I entered the room to check up on him, all okay, asks if the light can be a bit brighter so I put it on "2". He directly wants to continue the task. He doesn't seem to stretch much between the blocks and continues straight away. Block 3: ??. Stretches neck between blocks. Block 4: ??.sd_instruction: Participants understands the task well.sd_practice: Participants is motivated to continue and sits quite still. Results: 37/41. sd_main: Block 1: 77/81. Stretches and checks phone. Block 2: 79/81. Block 3: 76/81. Really good performance. Was quite fast in doing the task.
TAE instruction: asks if speed of reponse matters. Answer: correctness is most important, then speed. TAE practice: great performance, 32/32. Says she felt it went worse than that. I explain we only score the somewhat easier items, for fairness.TAE main: takes her bottle into the cubicle so she can drink during the breaks. I'll only come in after break 2, so halfway. Block 1 good performance (28/32), drinks a bit during break, sits back and takes a moment, adjusts chair. Block 2 great performance (32/32). Talks about how she wants to fix the back of the chair, but she found out that's not possible. Some grating seem vertical to her: is told that indeed some are harder than others. Says she missed 1 trial because she pressed too early and didn't realize. Block 3 (32/32). Takes some time to stretch her neck, then continues. Block 4 (30/32). Geeft aan dat ze tijdens het laatste block vlekkerig zicht kreeg. Licht hoger gezet: stand 2 ipv 3. Eats a bit in break.SD instruction: all clear.SD practice: great performance (40/41). Explains her eyes have started hurting and she sometimes cannot see the grating because of it. I emphasize that it is important she is not in discomfort- she is encouraged to take care of herself, take breaks, look away, come into the light, etc.SD main: block 1 (74/81). Comes outside and eats a bit in break. Tells me about fatigue of the eyes. Block 2 (77/81). Takes a very long break, seems demotivated, talks to herself. Then continues. Block 3
tae instruction: Participant had questions about what stimuli to respond to. Otherwise participant seems to understand the task.tae practice: Participant scored bad on the first block, so during the second block we did the task together. On the third block he scored 32/32.tae main: Participant seems calm and sits still, he will decide the length of the breaks himself. After the second block I will enter the room to check whether everything is okay. Performance on block 1 was good (28/32). Performance block 2 good (30/32). Enter the room to check if everything is okay, all good, participant wants to directly continue the task. Stretches his neck in breaks a bit. Block 3 (26/32). Stretches, yawns. Block 4 (30/32).sd explanation: Participant understands new response method well, still a bit confused whether the pattern is oriented left or right. sd practice: Responds with a sigh when he makes a mistake. Performance was okay 34/41. Seems to understand the task quite well now.sd main: Participant can choose when he takes a break. Sits still. Performance for block 1 is good (75/81). Block 2 (76/81). Stretches. Block 3 (72/81).
tae instruction: Participant understands the instructions well.tae practice: Participant is calm and enthusiastic to start. Performance is average (24/32). She understands the task correctly but does not score very well during the practice block. She thought she was already finished after the practice block. tae main: Participant is still comfortable. She is instructed to stretch during blocks and after the second block the experimenter will come into the room to check if everything is okay. Performance block 1 is below average (18/32). Spins a bit on the chair. Performance block 2 is below average (22/32). During break: experimenter checks if she understands everything and if all is still okay, seems to be the case, so she continues the task. Block 3: she sits more still, performance is excellent (32/32). Stretches and continues. Block 4: spins a bit on the chair, performance is excellent (32/32). After task 1 she said that she was more focused during the second half of the experiment.sd explanation: Participant thought that the response window would tell you something about the direction of the grating. Other than that she seems to understand the task and responses well. sd practice: Participant is calm. Performance is above threshold (32/41).sd main: Participant seems calm and understands the task. Block 1: Performance is okay (68/81). Block 2: performance is (64/81). Calls dad after the second block to inform him that experiment is almost finished. Block 3: good 64/81.
tae instruction: Participant understands task well. There were some issues with the chin-rest, so the instruction was done before setting the chair/chinrest etc and the discussion could have been distracting for the participant. tae practice: Performance was good (30/32). Participant understands the task.tae main: Participants sits quite still and is calm. Protocol for break: he can choose how long the break will be and after the second block I will check up on him. Instructed to stretch and he seems to follow the instructions well. Performance block 1: excellent (32/32). Block 2: excellent (32/32). Break, walk into room, everything is fine so he wants to continue. Block 3: (??/??). Block 4: (??/??)sd_instruction: partipant understands the task, all is clear.sd_practice: Participant seems to get used to the new response system. Performance is good (38/41).sd main: Participant chooses himself how long he wants to take a break. Block 1: xx/xx. Stretches during break. Block 2: performance is good (75/81). Takes a break, doesn't stretch. Block 3: xx/xx.
TAE instruction: seems bit amused by story, but takes it seriously. All clear.TAE practice: great score, 30/32. Agreed that I will check in after block 2 of the main task.TAE main: Block 1 (24/32). Takes a break, then continues. Block 2 (28/32). Break, I come in, he stretches, wants to continue again. Block 3 (30/32), brief break, continues. Block 4 (28/32). SD instruction: all clear.SD practice: (31/41), mentions this seems to go faster, but all is clear. Started new practice block. Block 2 (28/41), poorer than expected, but instructions are clear, so continue to main task.SD main: block 1 (67/81), decent. Takes a relatively long break. Block 2 (72/81), good. Relatively long break again. Block 3 (70/81).
sd explanation: participant did not see the direction of the gratings during the mini-practice. this worked out better later on. sd practice: participant seems quite calm. Performance first practice block is bad, 2/32. After first practice block it seemed like the participant switched the task responses around, explained it again and now it seems to be clear. Performance on second practice block is very good, 30/32. tae main: participant seems calm and alert. understands the task now. block 1: performance is good 30/32. Participant takes a short break. block 2: performance is excellent 32/32. Experimenter enters after second block, everything is okay. Wants to continue. Block 3: performance is excellent 32/32. takes a short break and continues. blcok 4: excellent 32/32.sd explanation: participant seems to understand the task. sd practice: practice goes well. 37/41sd main: block 1: performance is good, 71/82. block 2: performance is good 72/81. Takes medium length break. block 3: performance is good 72/81.
tae explanation:understands the task well.tae practice: performance is below average, 22/32. Instructed him again on the task and asked if he could explain what he did after seeing the gratings. He seems to understand the task well.tae main: block 1: excellent performance, 32/32. block 2: good performance 30/32. Experimenter enters room after the block ended, participant is okay though a bit tired/yawning. Continues. block 3: good performance 30/32. block 3: good performance 30/32?. block 4: good performance 28/32sd explanation: participant understands the task. indicates that he has difficulties with knowing if something is left/right in general.sd practice: performance is good 33/41. indicates that he thinks the task is trickier than the last one.sd main:block 1: performance is okay, 62/81. block 2: good performance 66/81. block 3: performance is great: 76/81.
tae explanation: participant is very quick in understanding the task. Everything is clear to him.tae practice: participant understands the task. turns a bit on the chair but seems focused. performance is excellent 32/32. Protocol for breaks: experimenter will check in after the second block.tae main: block 1: excellent performance 32/32. block 2: excellent performance 32/32. During break experimenter enters the room, all is okay, a bit cold and getting tired. Wants to continue and does not believe he has a perfect score. block 3: 32/32. block 4: 30/32.sd explanation: everything is clear.sd practice: practice went well, 32/41, participants understands the task well. Protocol break: he can decide himself how long he wants to take a break, experimenter will not enter the room.sd main: block 1: performance is good 70/81. block 2: 72/81. block 3: 64 /81.
tae explanation: practice went well, she understands the task, no questions.tae practice: performance below average, score 22/32. No missed responses. Protocol break: I will check up on her after each block. TV monitor does not work.tae main: block 1: performance is bad 12/32. Explained the task again and restarted the task.Second try: block 1: performance is good 26/32. Short break, enter room. block 2: good performance 26/32. Short break, enter room. block 3: below average performance 22/32. Short break, enter room, all still okay. block 4: performance is good 28/32.sd explanation: everything is clear, she understands the task, no questions.sd practice: good performance. After each block experimenter will enter the room to check up on her. sd main: block 1: performance is good 61?/81, block 2: performance is good 62?/81, block 3: performance is good 70/81.
Participant is tired because yesterday evening was the semi-final of the women's football world cup, where the Netherlands narrowly beat Sweden in overtime.TAE instruction: all clear.TAE practice: great performance (32/32), no questions. TAE main: no video monitoring possible, so participant is instructed I will come in every 5 minutes during the break to check up. Block 1 (32/32). Block 2 (32/32), I ask her to come out for a moment to get some light and have a break. Then continue, block 3 (32/32), block 4 (32/32). Brief break. Doesn't seem to want long breaks, doesn't want water, bathroom break or anything. Seems to prefer to continue and finish.SD instruction all clear.SD practice: great score (39/41).SD main: block 1 again great (79/81), block 2 (76/81), block 3 (
tae explanation: participant understands the task well.tae practice: practice went well, 28/32.tae main:block 1: 30/32block 2: 30/32block 3: 30/32block 4: 32/32sd explanation: participant understands the task well.sd practice: practice went well, 36/41.sd main: block1:good performance, 75/81. block 2: ?- block 3: 69/81.
tae explanation: participant understands the task quite well, correct responses and no questions. missed responses: 1. correct responses: 14 out of 15.tae practice: participant sits quite still, focussed. missed responses: 1. correct responses: 14 out of 15.tae main: block 1: I accidentally started the sd task, only realised after the first block. I stopped the task and started the tae_main task. block 1: tv monitor does not work, can't see participant movement. Performance: excellent 32/32. Takes break after block.block 2: performance is excellent 32/32. short break.block 3: excellent performance 32/32.block 4: excellent performance 32/32.sd explanation: participant understands task well. No questions for sd task.sd practice: performance is good, 38 out of 41.sd main: block 1: performance is good, 65/81. block 2: good performance, 60/81. block 3: ??/??
tae explanation: task is clear for participant. No questions. She said that her eyesight is not perfect, even with glasses, could maybe influence her performance on the task.tae practice: participant is calm and understands the task. Performance is below average 20/32. Practiced again, performance is excellent 32/32. Protocol for breaks, participant can decide herself how long her break will be, experimenter will check up on her after the second block.tae main: block 1: performance is good 30/32. block 2: performance is excellent 32/32. block 3: excellent 32/32. block 4: excellent 32/32.sd explanation: participant understands the task well.sd practice: good performace, everything is clear for the participant. Score is 36/41.sd main: block 1: good performance 70/81. block 2: performance is good 66/81. block 3: good performance 76?/61.
TAE instruction: all clear, no questions. NB participant does not know the difference between left and right (as in the words), so I adapt the instruction to "this side (pointing)" and "that side (pointing)".TAE practice: 22/32, clarification to compare zebra with vertical not with adaptor. Restart. Block 2: 20/32. Two missed responses because responded too fast. Block 3 I stay in with her and watch her responses, and correct/give feedback where necessary. Then score is 28/32.TAE main: block 1: 28/32. Block 2: 32/32. Block 3: 28/32. Block 4: 32/32. SD instruction: task seems clear.SD practice: good performance, 38/41.SD main: block 1 bad performance, 59/81. Block 2 67/81. Block 3: 65/81.
TAE instructions: clear, but seems to struggle with left/right.TAE practice: block 1 score of 2/32 suggests she understands the task but consistently uses the wrong button. Clarified instructions left/right, started new practice block. Block 2 (22/32), better, but let's try again to get more practice with the switched buttons. Block 3 (22/32), decided to continue with real task.TAE main: I will come in every break to check in. Block 1 (30/32), feels like it's going better now. Block 2 (32/32). Block 3 (28/32), reports she pressed the wrong button some time. Block 4 (30/32).Break, walk around the building 2 times.SD instruction: all clear, understands button mapping right away.SD practice: 33/41, decided to continue.SD main: block 1 (75/81), good performance, continue almost right away. Block 2 (67/81). Block 3 (72?/81).
TAE instructions all clear.TAE practice: "is de zebra dat ding wat er maar heel kort is?" > Ja! Performance low (~14/32), so started another practice block. Practice block 2 WORSE (4/42), check what is going wrong? Left/right confusion, interpreted rotation other way around. All else clear, and now that this is clarified, started real block, hoping for good performance.TAE main: block 1 suddenly perfect score (32/32), seems happy and relieved with that. Further instruction that I won't come in during the break anymore, he can decide himself how long to take a break, but is instructed to stretch during breaks. Stretches during this break also before continuing. Block 2 (30/32), stretches in break, notices & smiles at camera, then continues. Block 3 great performance again (32/32). Seems tired, maybe bored. Stretches. Good performance last block.Break.SD instruction: all clear. Seems to need some time for figuring out which button to use on each trial.SD practice: quite some missed trials, but good performance still: 40/41. Is confused, he missed a few trials? Explanation: most difficult trials are not scored. SD main started. Can decide for himself when to take breaks- is instructed to stretch during breaks. Block 1 (?/81), stretches. Block 2 good performance (74/81), still misses trials sometimes. Stretches, continues. Block 3 good (77/81), end.
Was verward door tae practice: zag 3 gratings i.p.v. 2. Grating 2 was het after-effect van grating 1. Zei na sd practice dat hij het lastig vond als de grating en de response mapping tegenstrijdige richtingen hadden.
Participant did an MRI experiment this morning during which he was sleepy and cramped. He said this experiment was more pleasant and that he did not experience the same issues.
Rightward bias, especially in TAE experiment

Vragenlijsten kind 9 maanden verlaat ingevuld, naar veelvuldige herinnering.

WISC V, daarom ruwe scores niet beschikbaar.
Exclusie op basis van IQ en performance sd taak.
NB: Participant contacted researchers ~10 months after participation about recently being diagnosed with ASS. She has been excluded since, for this reason.